<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brand.net &#187; Display Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brand.net/blog/category/display-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brand.net/blog</link>
	<description>Quality, Scale and Value. Guaranteed.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Q &amp; A on RTB</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/12/q-a-on-rtb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/12/q-a-on-rtb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 22:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madhu Vudali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SafeScreen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=3175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When the 2011 digital advertising predictions rolled out a year ago, RTB’s transformative nature was often cited.  While many <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/online-advertising/predictions-vc/">predictions</a> didn’t come to pass – this one did.  In <a href="http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/08/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising-part-2/">earlier posts</a>, I explained how RTB will transform brand advertising, not just&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/12/q-a-on-rtb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore Reach Rankings: Whither RTB? (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/11/comscore-reach-rankings-whither-rtb-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/11/comscore-reach-rankings-whither-rtb-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madhu Vudali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comScore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Previously, I discussed <a href="http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/10/comscore-reach-rankings-whither-rtb/">how comScore’s reach rankings are not keeping up with the emergence of RTB</a>. Agencies use these rankings for planning and to help select media partners. Hence, it is critical for them to figure out how RTB potentially&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/11/comscore-reach-rankings-whither-rtb-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On RTB and Brand Advertising (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/08/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/08/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madhu Vudali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClickZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Display Network Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I discussed <a title="On RTB and Brand Advertising" href="http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/07/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising/" target="_blank">how Brand advertising benefits from RTB</a>. Very quick refresher: <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/google-ceo-display-ad-market-could-become-200-billion-biz-125860">a $200B</a> online display ad market (i) of which <a href="../2011/06/go-neal/">35% has Brand KPIs</a> and (ii) with <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/saydowin/ds-ps-and-ad-exchanges">50% of the inventory in RTB</a>.  Big money opportunity.  We’re on it:  our&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/08/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On RTB and Brand Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/07/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/07/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madhu Vudali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Display Network Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At Brand.net, we focus on maximizing ROI for Brand advertisers.  We demonstrate day in day out that tight management of the <a href="../2011/07/finally-were-talking-about-brand-kpis/"><em>Metrics That Matter</em></a> – Reach/Frequency against the target audience, and high-quality, contextually oriented media – yields <a href="http://www.brand.net/results">outstanding offline sales ROI</a>. &#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/07/on-rtb-and-brand-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premium traction</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/premium-traction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/premium-traction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Atherton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Lesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Kawaja]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xaxis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has obviously been a ton of commentary already on WPP’s recent Xaxis announcements, but I wanted to highlight one specific element of Brian Lesser’s <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/agencies/xaxis/">AdExchanger Q&#38;A</a> on Monday that caught my eye.</p>
<p>Brian twice mentioned “Xaxis Premium”, saying it will “use&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/premium-traction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#8217;s the &#8220;LUMA slide&#8221; for branding?</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/wheres-the-luma-slide-for-branding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/wheres-the-luma-slide-for-branding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Atherton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Morrissey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Levick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LUMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Very <a href="http://www.digidaydaily.com/stories/where-s-the-luma-slide-for-branding/">interesting article</a> today from Brian Morrissey at Digiday, channeling Jeff Levick of AOL.</p>
<p>As Brian put it:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The truth of the matter is much of the machinery of the programmatic  buying landscape, captured in the Luma Partners slide, is dedicated to  non-guaranteed&#8230;</em></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/wheres-the-luma-slide-for-branding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Sales in Real Stores</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/real-sales-in-real-stores/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/real-sales-in-real-stores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Blair</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Keegan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Branding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Preparing our presentation for this week’s <a href="http://www.morgankeegan.com/techbanking/pr_pgc11_conference.htm">Morgan Keegan conference</a> got me thinking about how the online advertising technology ecosystem really does work.</p>
<p>To date, we’ve let an ambitious sell-side investment banker frame our industry.  I’m <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Gf8NK1WAOc">shocked!  Shocked </a>that he says there are&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/real-sales-in-real-stores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go Neal!</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/go-neal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/go-neal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Atherton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Display Network Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Mohan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some very interesting tidbits in <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/theres-perfect-ad-for-everyone.html">Neal Mohan’s post</a> on the Google blog yesterday.</p>
<p>First is that Google sees display inventory per user <strong><em>declining</em></strong> 25% by 2015.  This is a pretty interesting prediction given the conventional “wisdom” that online ad inventory is unlimited.  This&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/go-neal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/just-because-you-can-doesn%e2%80%99t-mean-you-should/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/just-because-you-can-doesn%e2%80%99t-mean-you-should/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Atherton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Weaver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today, I wanted to highlight and echo some recent commentary from two very smart online ad veterans, <a href="http://www.digidaydaily.com/stories/dave-morgan-on-why-the-web-comes-up-short/">Dave Morgan</a> and <a href="http://getthedrift.com/the-jet-principle-just-enough-targeting/">Doug Weaver</a>.</p>
<p>Their thesis in a nutshell is that the online advertising ecosystem has pursued an arms race of targeting upon targeting&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/06/just-because-you-can-doesn%e2%80%99t-mean-you-should/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on GDN Reserve</title>
		<link>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/04/more-on-gdn-reserve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/04/more-on-gdn-reserve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Atherton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Display Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Display Network Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publicis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VivaKi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brand.net/blog/?p=2743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Ad Exchanger published more commentary on Google’s GDN Reserve <a href="http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/04/google-launches-display-network-reserve/">announcement</a> last week.</p>
<p>Views from senior execs at <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-networks/reaction-vivaki-nerve-center-ceo-hecht-sees-guaranteed-sales-as-necessary-path-in-competitive-fragmented-market/">VivaKi</a> (Publicis) and <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-networks/reaction-google-montgomery/">Group M</a> (WPP) rounded out the additional commentary from <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-networks/google-responds-google-display-network-reserve/">Google</a> that was posted Monday.  John also published some <a href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-networks/reaction-industry/">additional perspective</a> from <a href="http://www.brand.net/company/management-team#eblair">Elizabeth</a> and others.</p>
<p>A few things&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.brand.net/blog/2011/04/more-on-gdn-reserve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

